Regional hyperthermia with cisplatin added to gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: The HEAT randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Regional hyperthermia (RHT) with cisplatin added to gemcitabine showed efficacy in gemcitabine-pre-treated patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. We conducted a randomised clinical trial to investigate RHT with cisplatin added to gemcitabine (GPH) compared with gemcitabine (G) in the adjuvant setting of resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: This randomised, multicentre, open-label trial randomly assigned patients to either GPH (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on day 1, 15 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 with RHT on day 2, 3 and 15,16) or to G (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on day 1,8,15), four-weekly over six cycles. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary end-point. Secondary end-points included overall survival (OS) and safety. RESULTS: A total of 117 eligible patients (median age, 63 years) were randomly allocated to treatment (57 GPH; 60 G). With a follow-up time of 56.6 months, the median DFS was 12.7 compared to 11.2 months for GPH and G, respectively (p = 0.394). Median post-recurrence survival was significantly prolonged in the GPH-group (15.3 versus 9.8 months; p = 0.031). Median OS reached 33.2 versus 25.2 months (p = 0.099) with 5-year survival rates of 28.4% versus 18.7%. Excluding eight patients who received additional capecitabine in the G-arm (investigators choice), median OS favoured GPH (p = 0.052). Adverse events CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) grade ≥3 occurred in 61.5% (GPH) versus 63.6% (G) of patients. Two patients in the G-group died because of treatment-related toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS: The randomised controlled Hyperthermia European Adjuvant Trial study failed to demonstrate a significant difference in DFS. However, it suggests a difference in post-recurrence survival and a trend for improved OS. CLINICALTRIALS: gov, number NCT01077427.

Prospective, Multicenter Study of 5-Fluorouracil Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated in Routine Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated that body surface area-based dosing of chemotherapy drugs leads to significant individual exposure variability, with a substantial risk of under- or overdosing. The present study was initiated to validate the use of therapeutic drug management (TDM) to personalize 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) dosing in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated in routine clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 75 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from 8 German medical centers received ≤ 6 administrations of infusional 5-FU according to the AIO (folinate, 5-FU; n = 16), FOLFOX6 (leucovorin calcium [folinic acid], 5-FU, and oxaliplatin; n = 26), or FUFOX (oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/folinic acid; n = 33) regimen. Initial infusional 5-FU dosing for all patients was determined by the BSA. Individual 5-FU exposure (area under the curve [AUC]) was measured using an immunoassay of a blood sample taken during each infusion. To achieve a target AUC of 20 to 30 mg × h/L, subsequent infusional 5-FU doses were adjusted according to the previous cycle's 5-FU AUC. The primary objective was to confirm that TDM of infusional 5-FU resulted in an increased proportion of patients in the target AUC range at the fourth versus the first administration. The secondary objective was to determine whether 5-FU TDM reduced the treatment-related toxicities compared with the historical data. RESULTS: The average 5-FU AUC at the first administration was 18 ± 6 mg × h/L, with 64%, 33%, and 3% of the patients below, within, or above the target AUC range, respectively. By the fourth administration, the average 5-FU AUC was 25 ± 7 mg × h/L (P < .001), with 54% of patients within the target 5-FU AUC range (P = .0294). The incidence of 5-FU-related grade 3 and 4 diarrhea (4.6%), nausea (3.4%), fatigue (0.0%), and mucositis (0.2%) was reduced compared with the historical data, despite 55% of the patients receiving increased doses. CONCLUSION: Personalization of 5-FU dosing using TDM in routine clinical practice resulted in significantly improved 5-FU exposure and suggested a lower incidence of 5-FU-related toxicities.

Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients by circulating apoptotic biomarkers nucleosomes, DNAse, cytokeratin-18 fragments and survivin.

Biomarkers predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally confined breast cancer (LBC) are highly needed. We prospectively assessed serial blood levels of apoptotic biomarkers nucleosomes, DNAse activity, cytokeratin-18 fragments (M30) and survivin in 51 LBC patients and correlated them with response to neoadjuvant treatment and established tumor markers. As controls, we used 31 healthy subjects, 13 patients with benign diseases and 28 with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Levels of nucleosomes and survivin were elevated in LBC and MBC while M30, CEA and CA 15-3 levels were only elevated in MBC. During neoadjuvant chemotherapy, LBC patients with no change of disease (N=13) had significantly higher pretherapeutic levels of nucleosomes than patients with remission (N=38). We conclude that apoptotic biomarkers bear valuable information for diagnosis and therapy response prediction in LBC patients.

Circulating immunogenic cell death biomarkers HMGB1 and RAGE in breast cancer patients during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients aims at preoperative reduction of tumor volume for better resection results and prognosis. As not all patients respond to neoadjuvant therapy, predictive biomarkers are needed for more efficient individual management. In prospectively collected sera of 51 consecutive locally confined breast cancer (LBC) patients receiving preoperative, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, value level kinetics of soluble high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) as well as the established breast cancer biomarkers CA 15-3 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were investigated and correlated with therapy response objectified by pathological staging at surgery. In addition, biomarkers were measured in sera of 30 healthy controls (HC), 13 patients with benign breast diseases, and 28 metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Pretherapeutic levels of soluble HMGB1 were decreased in MBC, while sRAGE was already decreased in LBC. In contrast, CA 15-3 and CEA were strongly elevated in MBC, but not in LBC. Combination of sRAGE and CA 15-3 enabled best discrimination of LBC from HC (AUC 78.2 %; sens 58 % at 95 % spec), while CA15-3 and CEA discriminated best between MBC and all controls (AUC 90.9 %; sens 70 % at 95 % spec). In LBC patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, nine patients achieved complete remission (CR), 29 achieved partial remission (PR), while 13 had no change of disease (NC). NC patients tended to have higher HMGB1 and lower sRAGE levels before therapy onset (p = 0.056 and p = 0.054), while CA 15-3 and CEA did not predict therapeutic outcome. Furthermore, kinetics of HMGB1 during therapy correlated with efficacy of the treatment (p = 0.053). Markers of immunogenic cell death are valuable for the diagnosis of MBC and early estimation of response to neoadjuvant therapy in LBC patients.

Circulating nucleosomes and biomarkers of immunogenic cell death as predictive and prognostic markers in cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Immunogenic cell death markers are released from apoptotic and necrotic cells upon pathologic or therapeutic causes and stimulate the innate and adaptive immune system. Cell death products such as nucleosomes, damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) molecules such as the high-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) and its receptor of advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) are supposed to play an essential role in driving this process. However, this immunogenic activation may have dual effects, either by sensitizing the immune system for more efficient tumor cell removal or by creating a favorable tumor microenvironment that facilitates tumor growth, proliferation and invasiveness. AREAS COVERED: Here, we review recent findings on the relevance of serum nucleosomes, DNAse activity, HMGB1 and sRAGE as biomarkers for the diagnosis, prognosis and therapy prediction in cancer disease. EXPERT OPINION: In comparison with healthy controls, cancer patients demonstrated elevated serum levels of nucleosomes and HMGB1 while sRAGE levels were decreased. During locoregional and systemic cytotoxic therapies, a high release of nucleosomes and HMGB1 as well as low release of sRAGE before and during the initial phase of the treatment was found to be associated with poor response to the therapy and patient survival. Therefore, immunogenic cell death markers are promising tools for the prognosis, therapy prediction and monitoring in cancer patients.

Apoptosis-related biomarkers sFAS, MIF, ICAM-1 and PAI-1 in serum of breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves surgical options and prognosis in patients with operable breast cancer. Predictive biomarkers are needed to choose the most effective therapy and to avoid unnecessary toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the courses of apoptosis-related serum biomarkers macrophage migration-inhibitory factor (MIF), soluble cell death receptor sFAS, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM), plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) as well as the oncological biomarkers carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA15-3) in prospectively collected sera of 51 patients with locally confined breast cancer undergoing preoperative chemotherapy. As controls 31 healthy women, 13 patients with benign breast disease and 28 patients with metastasized breast cancer were included. RESULTS: sFAS, MIF, CEA and CA15-3 showed significantly higher serum concentrations in patients with metastasized breast cancer than in healthy and benign controls. Additionally, sFAS and MIF discriminated between locally confined breast cancer and healthy controls with an area under the curve (AUC) in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of 73.4% and 70.7%. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 38 patients achieved complete (N=9) or partial (N=29) remission, while 13 patients had no change of disease. Pretherapeutic levels of MIF were considerably higher in non-responsive patients (p=0.082). In addition, post-therapeutic sICAM and CA15-3 levels were higher in patients without complete remission. CONCLUSION: Apoptosis-related biomarkers are valuable markers in breast cancer patients and show potential for early estimation of the efficiency of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methodological and preanalytical evaluation of an HMGB1 immunoassay.

BACKGROUND: Soluble high-mobility group box 1 (sHMGB1) is a promising biomarker for the prognosis and the monitoring of cancer and of acute diseases such as trauma and sepsis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated the methodological characteristics of an ELISA for sHMGB1 (Shino-Test, Tokyo, Japan and IBL, Hamburg, Germany) including intra- and inter-assay imprecision, dilution linearity and differences in serum and plasma materials. Furthermore, the influence of various preanalytical factors such as time and storage temperature before and after centrifugation prior to definite deep freezing, as well as multiple freeze-thaw cycles were tested. By the use of sera from 28 healthy individuals, a reference range and the dependency on patient characteristics were established. RESULTS: Intra-assay imprecision (coefficients of variation (CV)=1.2-4.8%) and inter-assay imprecision (10.3-14.0%) were in an acceptable range of manual assays. HMGB1 levels were found to be considerably lower in EDTA plasma as compared to serum samples. Linearity testing yielded satisfying results with dilution recoveries of 100-121% (mean=112.3%). sHMGB1 results were the same when samples were kept at 4°C and 25°C after centrifugation, for up to 7 days (recoveries 87-128%). Delay before centrifugation led to a considerable increase in some samples. The median values for healthy individuals was 1.3 ng/ml, and the 95th percentile was 4.1 ng/ml. HMGB1 levels correlated inversely with age (R=0.33). CONCLUSION: The sHMGB1 ELISA is a robust and safe assay producing reliable quantitative results in sera.

Methodological and preanalytical evaluation of a RAGE immunoassay.

BACKGROUND: Soluble receptor of advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) is a promising biomarker for the prognosis and the monitoring of cancer and of acute diseases such as trauma and sepsis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated the methodological characteristics of an ELISA for sRAGE (R&D Diagnostics) including intra- and inter-assay imprecision, dilution linearity and differences in various serum and plasma materials. Furthermore, the influence of various preanalytical factors such as time and storage temperature before and after centrifugation prior to definite deep freezing, as well as multiple freeze-thaw cycles, were tested. By the use of sera from 30 healthy individuals, a reference range and the dependency on patient characteristics was established. RESULTS: Intra-assay imprecision (coefficients of variation (CV): 6.0-11.5%) and inter-assay imprecision (5.9-7.8%) were in an acceptable range of manual assays. Linearity testing yielded satisfying results with dilution recoveries of 99-131%. Results of serum, EDTA-plasma (recovery of 85.9-114.7%), and heparin-plasma samples (88-102%) were quite comparable, while results from citrate-plasma were slightly lower (78-96%). There was no influence of the time to centrifugation after 6 and 24 hours (recoveries 87-102%) at storage temperatures of 4°C and 25°C. Similarly, results were the same when samples were kept at 4°C and 25°C after centrifugation for up to 7 days (recoveries 88-109%). Repeated freeze-thawing of samples did not affect the results obtained for the RAGE protein (recoveries 92-104%). The median value of healthy individuals was 1.10 ng/ml, with 90% limits of 0.52 to 1.49 ng/ml. CONCLUSION: sRAGE ELISA is a very robust and safe assay which produces reliable quantitative results for sera and plasma measurements.

Modulation of apoptosis by mitochondrial uncouplers: apoptosis-delaying features despite intrinsic cytotoxicity.

Disruption of mitochondrial electron transport and opening of the so-called mitochondrial permeability transition pores (PTPs) are early events in apoptotic cell death and may be caused by the uncoupler of mitochondrial oxidation and phosphorylation, carbonyl cyanide p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP). We investigated the cellular toxicity of FCCP in HL60 and CCRF-CEM cells alone or in combination with the known apoptosis inducers such as inhibitor of serine/threonine protein kinases staurosporine (Sts) and protein kinase C inhibitor chelerythrine. FCCP induced apoptotic cell death in both cell lines in a dose-dependent manner, and we were able to demonstrate an appearance of caspase-3-dependent PARP cleavage fragments with Western blot and the appearance of large (15-50 kb) DNA fragments using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. After 2 hr of incubation with Che or Sts more than half of the cells had died by apoptosis. We observed a statistically significant delay in Sts- and Che-induced apoptotic cell death in CCRF-CEM cells when the cells were preincubated with FCCP but not with zVAD-FMK: about 50% more cells survived after pre-treatment with FCCP, as compared to 1 hr treatment with Che alone (P<0.05), and 25% more cells were alive after 6 hr of treatment, as compared to 6 hr exposure to Sts alone (P<0.05). The protective effect of FCCP was, however, transient and lasted only 6 hr. Treatment with aurintricarboxylic acid completely prevented Che- and Sts-induced apoptotic cell death in CCRF-CEM and HL60 cells. Incubation with Che resulted in a drop in the intracellular ATP content, predominantly distinctive in HL60, and in NAD(+) content in CCRF-CEM cells. Both ATP and NAD(+) drop were prevented with ATA, but not with FCCP or zVAD. Our data suggest that treatment with uncouplers of oxidative phosphorylation can induce apoptotic cell death in haematopoietic cell lines. However, when used in combination with serine/threonine protein kinase inhibitors FCCP can even prevent apoptosis.